rosalarian:

cubebreaker:

TurboRoo, a chihuahua born without its front legs, was given a 3D printed cart made by San Diego firm 3dyn so he could train to be a service dog for disabled children.

I think we could all use these pics today. Golly!

blood-and-vitriol:

souzou-ryoku:

blood-and-vitriol:

ladybuglights:

zukosmind:

This would be funny if it weren’t so true

This reminds me of a workshop on gender that I attended once. Most of the people involved in the workshop were queer cis women, with a handful of cis het women, too. They’d put up large sheets of paper around the room, with words like “trans woman” “trans man” “cis woman” “cis man” “genderqueer” “non binary” “genitals” “chromosomes” “gender identity” “pronouns” and the like printed on them. Then they encouraged us to summarize in a phrase or short sentence what those words meant to us, and write them on the sheets of paper. 
When it came time to discuss the papers around the room, we’d see phrases like “hot” and “super attractive” and “sexy” on the trans man sheet, and “weird” “I don’t know what this is” and “fierce” written on the trans woman sheet. (Sadly, I don’t remember the other phrases for the other sheets, but those aren’t salient to my point.) I took a moment to point out the disparity between the two groups of responses, and received looks of astonishment from the other participants, as if nobody had actually realized they even had a biased or kind of really fucked up perspective.
That was kind of the beginning of the end, when it came to my involvement in that organization. :[

Literally had the first part of this comic happen to me several times. Someone who clearly and explicitly says they’re into you and wants to see you again/invite you home for/do the sexy thing/meet up in person is suddenly not attracted to trans women when they find out you are one. No matter how brazenly they were communicating their interest beforehand.

Please stop shaming people whose sexual attraction depends on genitalia. Above story is not an example of this but there are a lot of people who cannot help but be not attracted to and unable to have healthy relationships with people who do not have their preference of genitalia and that is how their sexual attraction functions.Sorry if you ever got your feelings hurt by this, but I know it’s something that some people are unable to change and it is how their sexual attraction functions. Above comic is a primary example of someone whose sexual attraction is probably based on genitalia not gender. Do not shame them for it.

You’re equating being trans with designated sex at birth with genitalia. I shouldn’t even need to point out all the reasons why that is ignorant, callous and harmful (and not just to trans women, even if it seems like a certain subset of trans men have decided to shrug it off in the name of getting laid), but here we find ourselves.
So the first thing is just, that’s factually incorrect. Like, trans people are kind of noted for being one of the few populations that regularly seek extensive genital modification. It’s one of the things cis folks can never stop focusing on, the whole changing thing, so it’s kinda hard to believe you merely forgot to take note of it.
The practical upshot of this is that you have no clue what a trans person has in their pants unless they decide to tell you. This comic, and my anecdote, share an important thing in common: *at no point were specific genitals described or even alluded to.* They do not depict a frank and open discussion between two explicitly-communicating parties about what exactly their bodies are like under the clothing, what they want to do in bed, and how well their respective interests line up. There is no talk of genital preferences: there *is* clear and open communication of attraction, followed by misgendering and a denial of that attraction *as soon as the other person finds out that a woman is trans.*
 Also, you’re either missing or ignoring the whole double standard on display here. We don’t know what’s in that trans dude’s pants either — in the comic, or in real-life interactions. Yet trans men who haven’t disclosed genital status are routinely sought after by self-proclaimed lesbians who “aren’t interested in men.” There really is no way to defend the vast disparity, when you have to either ask directly or roll the dice in the bedroom to find out (and really, how likely do you think it is they’re kicking out trans men who turn out to have penises?). Cis lesbians and DFAB genderqueers who claim to be attracted to women will show women the door just for disclosing being trans no matter how eager they were to find out moments before — but will happily take that chance, no questions asked even, with self-described men.
This is not the behavior of people with “genital preferences”, and attempting to tie it into orientation is dishonest. And even if that was really all that was going on — guess what? Sexual attraction and preferences are affected by social conditioning too — do you think it’s coincidence that tons of white queers will unabashedly insist that they’re “just not attracted” to PoC, (*especially* black) who otherwise fit their profile? Who they may have even voiced great attraction to moments before — especially if they were initially talking online and couldn’t see the person, or otherwise took the person for white?
Do you think it’s a coincidence that trans women, disabled people, people of color, fat people, etc find themselves in this situation on a regular basis? The same groups of people who are particularly likely to be told, by society and individuals, in a thousand overt and subtle ways, that they have no value and are undesirable even among queer folks? Even among queer folks who politicize their sexuality and claim it’s revolutionary to do so?
It’s not. There is a reason why that happens, and it has everything to do with bias against marginalized groups. Pointing that out, and having feelings about it that are not warm and bubbly and charitable, is perfectly legitimate. It is not “shaming” people for their “preferences.” Saying that is incorrect at best, disingenuous at worst. It also hurts people who may actually be targeted for bullying and harassment on account of having unpopular preferences, so don’t do that.

blood-and-vitriol:

souzou-ryoku:

blood-and-vitriol:

ladybuglights:

zukosmind:

This would be funny if it weren’t so true

This reminds me of a workshop on gender that I attended once. Most of the people involved in the workshop were queer cis women, with a handful of cis het women, too. They’d put up large sheets of paper around the room, with words like “trans woman” “trans man” “cis woman” “cis man” “genderqueer” “non binary” “genitals” “chromosomes” “gender identity” “pronouns” and the like printed on them. Then they encouraged us to summarize in a phrase or short sentence what those words meant to us, and write them on the sheets of paper. 

When it came time to discuss the papers around the room, we’d see phrases like “hot” and “super attractive” and “sexy” on the trans man sheet, and “weird” “I don’t know what this is” and “fierce” written on the trans woman sheet. (Sadly, I don’t remember the other phrases for the other sheets, but those aren’t salient to my point.) I took a moment to point out the disparity between the two groups of responses, and received looks of astonishment from the other participants, as if nobody had actually realized they even had a biased or kind of really fucked up perspective.

That was kind of the beginning of the end, when it came to my involvement in that organization. :[

Literally had the first part of this comic happen to me several times. Someone who clearly and explicitly says they’re into you and wants to see you again/invite you home for/do the sexy thing/meet up in person is suddenly not attracted to trans women when they find out you are one. No matter how brazenly they were communicating their interest beforehand.

Please stop shaming people whose sexual attraction depends on genitalia. Above story is not an example of this but there are a lot of people who cannot help but be not attracted to and unable to have healthy relationships with people who do not have their preference of genitalia and that is how their sexual attraction functions.

Sorry if you ever got your feelings hurt by this, but I know it’s something that some people are unable to change and it is how their sexual attraction functions. Above comic is a primary example of someone whose sexual attraction is probably based on genitalia not gender. Do not shame them for it.

You’re equating being trans with designated sex at birth with genitalia. I shouldn’t even need to point out all the reasons why that is ignorant, callous and harmful (and not just to trans women, even if it seems like a certain subset of trans men have decided to shrug it off in the name of getting laid), but here we find ourselves.

So the first thing is just, that’s factually incorrect. Like, trans people are kind of noted for being one of the few populations that regularly seek extensive genital modification. It’s one of the things cis folks can never stop focusing on, the whole changing thing, so it’s kinda hard to believe you merely forgot to take note of it.

The practical upshot of this is that you have no clue what a trans person has in their pants unless they decide to tell you. This comic, and my anecdote, share an important thing in common: *at no point were specific genitals described or even alluded to.* They do not depict a frank and open discussion between two explicitly-communicating parties about what exactly their bodies are like under the clothing, what they want to do in bed, and how well their respective interests line up. There is no talk of genital preferences: there *is* clear and open communication of attraction, followed by misgendering and a denial of that attraction *as soon as the other person finds out that a woman is trans.*

 Also, you’re either missing or ignoring the whole double standard on display here. We don’t know what’s in that trans dude’s pants either — in the comic, or in real-life interactions. Yet trans men who haven’t disclosed genital status are routinely sought after by self-proclaimed lesbians who “aren’t interested in men.” There really is no way to defend the vast disparity, when you have to either ask directly or roll the dice in the bedroom to find out (and really, how likely do you think it is they’re kicking out trans men who turn out to have penises?). Cis lesbians and DFAB genderqueers who claim to be attracted to women will show women the door just for disclosing being trans no matter how eager they were to find out moments before — but will happily take that chance, no questions asked even, with self-described men.

This is not the behavior of people with “genital preferences”, and attempting to tie it into orientation is dishonest. And even if that was really all that was going on — guess what? Sexual attraction and preferences are affected by social conditioning too — do you think it’s coincidence that tons of white queers will unabashedly insist that they’re “just not attracted” to PoC, (*especially* black) who otherwise fit their profile? Who they may have even voiced great attraction to moments before — especially if they were initially talking online and couldn’t see the person, or otherwise took the person for white?

Do you think it’s a coincidence that trans women, disabled people, people of color, fat people, etc find themselves in this situation on a regular basis? The same groups of people who are particularly likely to be told, by society and individuals, in a thousand overt and subtle ways, that they have no value and are undesirable even among queer folks? Even among queer folks who politicize their sexuality and claim it’s revolutionary to do so?

It’s not. There is a reason why that happens, and it has everything to do with bias against marginalized groups. Pointing that out, and having feelings about it that are not warm and bubbly and charitable, is perfectly legitimate. It is not “shaming” people for their “preferences.” Saying that is incorrect at best, disingenuous at worst. It also hurts people who may actually be targeted for bullying and harassment on account of having unpopular preferences, so don’t do that.

vinebox:

Watching Pokémon on Saturday mornings as a kid

blankmuse:

ssecretfires:

Pug gets scolded by owner and takes it to heart.

"sometime u do"

I love this video.

xsheislove:

nitawhatyouneed:

BUT WHY IS NO ONE FOLLOWING THIS

This is the only rule you need

xsheislove:

nitawhatyouneed:

BUT WHY IS NO ONE FOLLOWING THIS

This is the only rule you need

what is the most noticeable thing of my art style?

accursedasche:

Explain?

michaelgordons:

PLEASE STAY SAFE GUYS (x)

dare-for-distances:

Thank you MTV for bringing acknowledgment to something that nobody els on the news will